Earlier this summer, the Post asked our readers what issues you wanted to hear candidates running for De Soto Board of Education to address leading up to the Nov. 4 election.
Based on that feedback, we developed a five-item questionnaire centering the issues most important to the USD 232 community.
Each day this week, we’re publishing the candidates’ responses to one question.
Today, we’re publishing candidates’ responses to the following question:
Artificial intelligence: Artificial intelligence is a new and rapidly evolving technology that proponents say can revolutionize many aspects of modern life, including teaching and learning. But many people in education worry about AI’s impacts and possible abuses, including facilitating cheating and making students’ and staff’s personal data less secure. How should your district approach establishing policies and protocols when it comes to the use of AI in schools?
Below are the answers the Post received from candidates on this issue:
Member 4
Lucy Rumsey DeWitt
Did not provide the Post with a response.
Nancy Moneymaker
The De Soto School District has students sign the Acceptable Use Policy Governing Student Use of District Technology. While this policy does not specifically address artificial intelligence (AI), I would like to focus on the AI delivery aspect of technology use through personal and 1:1 devices.
Personal devices are reportedly managed at the classroom level under each teacher’s guidance. Approaches vary widely from requiring students to place their devices in a designated container outside the classroom, to allowing unrestricted use within class. This flexibility appears to apply primarily to upper grades, with teachers exercising their discretion based on their understanding of their students.
Regarding the district-issued 1:1 devices, I would encourage teachers to minimize classroom screen time or consider not issuing the devices altogether.
The only instance in which I see student use of technology as essential is in courses that teach advanced computer skills, including ethics, software, and hardware. Skills that can support future careers or lifelong learning. Additionally, students with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) should, of course, be granted special accommodations as needed.
In any scenario involving AI or device use, I believe it is important to gather feedback from both teachers and students. Their insights would help evaluate whether these technologies enhance or detract from the core purpose of education, the teaching and learning of knowledge.
Member 5
Christian Amend
Did not provide the Post with a response.
Calley Malloy (incumbent)
Did not provide the Post with a response.
Member 6
TJ Finan
Did not provide the Post with a response.
Brandi Jonasson (incumbent)
USD 232 understands that Artificial Intelligence (AI) is quickly changing how we learn, work, and connect with the world around us. As a district, we want our students to feel confident using these new tools while learning to do so responsibly and with integrity.
Our approach to AI is built around three ideas-
- Inquiry – Learning starts with curiosity and original thinking.
- AI Assistance – AI can be a helpful tool to spark creativity, explore new ideas, and
boost productivity. - Reflection – Every project should end with students taking ownership of their work
and showing their own understanding.
This approach helps make sure AI supports learning rather than replacing important human skills like critical thinking, creativity, communication, collaboration, and making good, ethical decisions.
Right now, USD 232 is developing guidance for teachers and staff on how to use AI responsibly in classrooms. The Board of Education will continue to stay involved as this technology grows and changes. Together, we’re committed to using AI in ways that enhance learning, protect integrity, and help every student thrive.
